Rule Changes from 2007?

Postby TURBOUGH » Wed Jun 25, 2008 3:30 am

Being the points leader could also indicate that a team didn't have many injuries to deal with.
TURBOUGH
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 6:00 pm

Rule Changes from 2007?

Postby Raiders » Wed Jun 25, 2008 5:16 am

Originally posted by TURBOUGH:
Being the points leader could also indicate that a team didn't have many injuries to deal with.
I guess you want my input on this. My first three round draft picks all were lost for the season early. 1.11-Rudi,2.4-Marvin and 3.4 Caddy.

To this I say, three bad picks, not bad luck. I blame the guy drafting these players not the players. So 13 weeks is better, than 3 weeks, let alone one week. Who's to say you won't get injuries in weeks 14th-16th?
Raiders
 
Posts: 3310
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 6:00 pm

Rule Changes from 2007?

Postby TURBOUGH » Wed Jun 25, 2008 5:10 pm

I couldn't agree more Snake. This is a perfect reason why we should have a third place playoff.

If you lose a couple of key players early in the season but get them back after 6-7 weeks then you've probably lost some ground on the points side and because record has little value in this league, your season is all but done.

I wish Greg would at least put this issue to vote. It can't hurt anything at all.
TURBOUGH
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 6:00 pm

Rule Changes from 2007?

Postby kapefear » Tue Jul 01, 2008 9:51 am

I can honestly say that I was interviewed at N.Y. last year about this question.My arrogence stated on film that "luck" was a small factor and "my"ability to put the perfect team"NO INJURIES" involved would state its case.I lost Steven Jackson,Andre Johnson,Caddilac all in the same week.In turn lost 2 more starters the next week.I had Green bays starting r.b with Tampas starting r.b.'s and couldnt carry 6 total backs between both teams.Therefore I LOST out on Ryan Grant and Earnest Graham.Bad coaching or lack of roster spots?I am now a FIRM believer of the injury bug.I am defianetly looking at a new stategy hoping do BOLSTER my strenght and never have to deal with this FIASCO again....Hope to be HISSING back at the SNAKE this year....
kapefear
 
Posts: 912
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 6:00 pm

Rule Changes from 2007?

Postby TURBOUGH » Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:05 am

Originally posted by kapefear:
I can honestly say that I was interviewed at N.Y. last year about this question.My arrogence stated on film that "luck" was a small factor and "my"ability to put the perfect team"NO INJURIES" involved would state its case.I lost Steven Jackson,Andre Johnson,Caddilac all in the same week.In turn lost 2 more starters the next week.I had Green bays starting r.b with Tampas starting r.b.'s and couldnt carry 6 total backs between both teams.Therefore I LOST out on Ryan Grant and Earnest Graham.Bad coaching or lack of roster spots?I am now a FIRM believer of the injury bug.I am defianetly looking at a new stategy hoping do BOLSTER my strenght and never have to deal with this FIASCO again....Hope to be HISSING back at the SNAKE this year....
I'm sure after 4-5 weeks, you had lost all hope since you had fallen so far behind in points. We have 14 teams and ONLY 2 playoff positions. I don't get it. Just knowing I could be tied with the best record and get zilch really sucks. I thought it would change this year but I feel there wasn't much consideration.
TURBOUGH
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 6:00 pm

Previous

Return to NFFC Rules Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron